whit

The #Bezos #Myth #🧵

What people think happened

Bezos = lone visionary Garage + brains + hustle Market rewards brilliance

Nice bedtime story.

Savage version …

Perfect. Here it is kid-simple, red / yellow / green, ready to turn into individual cards or gifts.

Legend (lock this in):

🔴 = BAD (hurts people / traps them) 🟡 = MIXED (some good, still harmful) 🟢 = GOOD (helps people / lets them leave)

⸻

🎁 #TECH #LEADERS — CHILD-LEVEL #SCORECARDS

⸻

Mark #Zuckerberg

•	Lets people leave easily: 🔴
•	Watches people: 🔴
•	Shares power: 🔴
•	Makes people kinder: 🔴

FINAL: 🔴🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🔴 RED

⸻

#Sundar Pichai

•	Transparent rules: 🔴
•	Fair visibility: 🔴
•	User control: 🔴
•	Open access: 🟡

FINAL: 🔴🔴🔴🟡 OVERALL: 🔴 RED

⸻

Jeff #Bezos

•	Lets people leave easily: 🔴
•	Treats humans kindly: 🔴
•	Shares gains fairly: 🔴
•	Improves dignity: 🔴

FINAL: 🔴🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🔴 RED

⸻

Sam #Altman

•	Lets people opt out: 🔴
•	Shares control: 🔴
•	Transparency: 🔴
•	Reduces systemic risk: 🟡

FINAL: 🔴🔴🔴🟡 OVERALL: 🔴 RED (DANGEROUS)

⸻

Peter #Thiel • Respects privacy: 🔴 • Supports democracy: 🔴 • Shares power: 🔴 • Reduces harm: 🔴

FINAL: 🔴🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🔴 RED

⸻

Elon #Musk

•	Builds useful things: 🟢
•	Respects rules & norms: 🔴
•	Shares power: 🔴
•	Improves conversation: 🔴

FINAL: 🟢🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🟡 YELLOW (UNSTABLE)

⸻

#TimCook

•	Protects users: 🟡
•	Allows competition: 🔴
•	Shares platform power: 🔴
•	Lets people leave: 🔴

FINAL: 🟡🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🟡 YELLOW

⸻

#Satya Nadella

•	Friendly tone: 🟡
•	Centralizes power: 🔴
•	Easy to exit: 🔴
•	Reduces dependency: 🔴

FINAL: 🟡🔴🔴🔴 OVERALL: 🟡 YELLOW (BIG SYSTEM)

⸻

Jack #Dorsey

•	Admits mistakes: 🟢
•	Tries to fix harm: 🟢
•	Fully solves problems: 🟡
•	Shares power: 🟢

FINAL: 🟢🟢🟡🟢 OVERALL: 🟢 GREEN (LEARNING)

⸻

Satoshi #Nakamoto

•	Lets people leave: 🟢
•	Watches no one: 🟢
•	Shares power: 🟢
•	Improves dignity: 🟢

FINAL: 🟢🟢🟢🟢 OVERALL: 🟢 GREEN (GOLD STAR) ⭐️

⸻

🧠 WHY THIS WORKS FOR KIDS (AND ADULTS) • 🔴 = “This hurts people” • 🟡 = “Some good, still dangerous” • 🟢 = “This helps and lets you choose”

#tech #madness #scorecards #fax #📠

How tech's richest plan to save themselves after the apocalypse This article is more than 7 years old #now

Silicon Valley’s elite are hatching plans to escape disaster – and when it comes, they’ll leave the rest of us behind

Douglas Rushkoff for Medium Tue 24 Jul 2018 02.00 EDT

Last year, I got invited to a super-deluxe private resort to deliver a keynote speech to what I assumed would be a hundred or so investment bankers. It was by far the largest fee I had ever been offered for a talk – about half my annual professor’s salary – all to deliver some insight on the subject of “the future of technology”.

I’ve never liked talking about the future. The Q&A sessions always end up more like parlor games, where I’m asked to opine on the latest #technology #buzzwords as if they were ticker symbols for potential investments:

#blockchain #3D printing #Crispr

The audiences are rarely interested in learning about these technologies or their potential impacts beyond the #binary choice of whether or not to invest in them. But money talks, so I took the gig.

After I arrived, I was ushered into what I thought was the green room. But instead of being wired with a microphone or taken to a stage, I just sat there at a plain round table as my audience was brought to me: five super-wealthy guys – yes, all men – from the upper echelon of the #hedge #fund #world . After a bit of small talk, I realized they had no interest in the information I had prepared about the future of technology. They had come with questions of their own.

They started out innocuously enough. #Ethereum or #bitcoin ? Is quantum computing a real thing? Slowly but surely, however, they edged into their real topics of concern.

Which region will be less affected by the coming climate crisis: New Zealand or Alaska? Is Google really building Ray Kurzweil a home for his brain, and will his consciousness live through the transition, or will it die and be reborn as a whole new one? Finally, the CEO of a brokerage house explained that he had nearly completed building his own underground bunker system and asked: “How do I maintain authority over my security force after the #Event ?

The Event. That was their euphemism for the environmental collapse, social unrest, nuclear explosion, unstoppable virus, or Mr Robot hack that takes everything down. ‼️🚨⏰

It’s a reduction of human evolution to a video game won by finding the escape hatch and bringing BFFs along for the ride

This single question occupied us for the rest of the hour. They knew armed guards would be required to protect their compounds from the angry mobs. But how would they pay the guards once money was worthless? What would stop the guards from choosing their own leader? The #billionaires considered using special combination locks on the food supply that only they knew. Or making guards wear disciplinary collars of some kind in return for their survival. Or maybe building #robots to serve as guards and workers – if that technology could be developed in time.

That’s when it hit me: at least as far as these gentlemen were concerned, this was a talk about the future of technology. Taking their cue from Elon #Musk colonizing #Mars Peter #Thiel reversing the ageing process, or Sam #Altman and Ray #Kurzweil uploading their minds into supercomputers,

they were preparing for a digital future that had a whole lot less to do with making the world a better place than it did with transcending the human condition altogether and insulating themselves from a very real and present danger of

👀🫣🫡 #climate change, rising sea levels, mass migrations, global pandemics, nativist panic, and resource depletion. For them, the future of technology is really about just one thing: #escape

There’s nothing wrong with madly optimistic appraisals of how technology might benefit human society. But the current drive for a post-human utopia is something else. It’s less a vision for the wholesale migration of humanity to a new a state of being than a quest to transcend all that is human: the body, interdependence, compassion, vulnerability, and complexity. As technology philosophers have been pointing out for years, now, the #transhumanist vision too easily reduces all of reality to data, concluding that “humans are nothing but information-processing objects”.

It’s a reduction of human evolution to a video game that someone wins by finding the escape hatch and then letting a few of his BFFs come along for the ride.

💥💥💥💥💥 Will it be Musk, #Bezos , Thiel … #Zuckerberg ?

These billionaires are the presumptive winners of the #digital economy – the same survival-of-the-fittest business landscape that’s fueling most of this speculation to begin with.

Of course, it wasn’t always this way. There was a brief moment, in the early 1990s, when the digital future felt open-ended and up for our invention.

📝Hence why #Nostr & making it best is imperative

Technology was becoming a playground for the counterculture, who saw in it the opportunity to create a more inclusive, distributed, and pro-human future. But established business interests only saw new potentials for the same old extraction, and too many technologists were seduced by unicorn IPOs. Digital futures became understood more like stock futures or cotton futures – something to predict and make bets on. So nearly every speech, article, study, documentary, or white paper was seen as relevant only insofar as it pointed to a ticker symbol. The future became less a thing we create through our present-day choices or hopes for humankind than a predestined scenario we bet on with our venture capital but arrive at passively.

This freed everyone from the moral implications of their activities. Technology development became less a story of collective flourishing than personal survival. Worse, as I learned, to call attention to any of this was to unintentionally cast oneself as an enemy of the market or an anti-technology curmudgeon.

So instead of considering the practical ethics of impoverishing and exploiting the many in the name of the few, most academics, journalists, and science fiction writers instead considered much more abstract and fanciful conundrums: is it fair for a stock trader to use smart drugs? Should children get implants for foreign languages? Do we want autonomous vehicles to prioritize the lives of pedestrians over those of its passengers? Should the first Mars colonies be run as democracies? Does changing my DNA undermine my identity? Should robots have rights?

illustration of rotting fruit View image in fullscreen ‘The “out of sight, out of mind” externalization of poverty and poison doesn’t go away just because we’ve covered our eyes with VR goggles.’ Illustration: Matt Huynh Asking these sorts of questions, while philosophically entertaining, is a poor substitute for wrestling with the real moral quandaries associated with unbridled technological development in the name of corporate capitalism. Digital platforms have turned an already exploitative and extractive marketplace (think Walmart) into an even more dehumanizing successor (think Amazon). Most of us became aware of these downsides in the form of automated jobs, the gig economy, and the demise of local retail.

But the more devastating impacts of pedal-to-the-metal digital capitalism fall on the environment and global poor. The manufacture of some of our computers and smartphones still uses networks of slave labor. These practices are so deeply entrenched that a company called Fairphone, founded from the ground up to make and market ethical phones, learned it was impossible. (The company’s founder now sadly refers to their products as “fairer” phones.)

The very essence of what it means to be human is treated less as a feature than bug Meanwhile, the mining of rare earth metals and disposal of our highly digital technologies destroys human habitats, replacing them with toxic waste dumps, which are then picked over by peasant children and their families, who sell usable materials back to the manufacturers.

This “out of sight, out of mind” externalization of poverty and poison doesn’t go away just because we’ve covered our eyes with VR goggles and immersed ourselves in an alternate reality. If anything, the longer we ignore the social, economic, and environmental repercussions, the more of a problem they become. This, in turn, motivates even more withdrawal, more isolationism and apocalyptic fantasy – and more desperately concocted technologies and business plans. The cycle feeds itself.

The more committed we are to this view of the world, the more we come to see human beings as the problem and technology as the solution. The very essence of what it means to be human is treated less as a feature than a bug. No matter their embedded biases, technologies are declared neutral. Any bad behaviors they induce in us are just a reflection of our own corrupted core. It’s as if some innate human savagery is to blame for our troubles. Just as the inefficiency of a local taxi market can be “solved” with an app that bankrupts human drivers, the vexing inconsistencies of the human psyche can be corrected with a digital or genetic upgrade.

Ultimately, according to the technosolutionist orthodoxy, the human future climaxes by uploading our consciousness to a computer or, perhaps better, accepting that technology itself is our evolutionary successor. Like members of a gnostic cult, we long to enter the next transcendent phase of our development, shedding our bodies and leaving them behind, along with our sins and troubles.

How to fix big tech? We need the right language to describe it first Marc DaCosta Read more Our movies and television shows play out these fantasies for us. Zombie shows depict a post-apocalypse where people are no better than the undead – and seem to know it. Worse, these shows invite viewers to imagine the future as a zero-sum battle between the remaining humans, where one group’s survival is dependent on another one’s demise. Even Westworld – based on a science fiction novel in which robots run amok – ended its second season with the ultimate reveal: human beings are simpler and more predictable than the artificial intelligences we create. The robots learn that each of us can be reduced to just a few lines of code, and that we’re incapable of making any willful choices. Heck, even the robots in that show want to escape the confines of their bodies and spend their rest of their lives in a computer simulation.

The mental gymnastics required for such a profound role reversal between humans and machines all depend on the underlying assumption that humans suck. Let’s either change them or get away from them, forever.

Thus, we get tech billionaires launching electric cars into space – as if this symbolizes something more than one billionaire’s capacity for corporate promotion. And if a few people do reach escape velocity and somehow survive in a bubble on Mars – despite our inability to maintain such a bubble even here on Earth in either of two multibillion-dollar biosphere trials – the result will be less a continuation of the human diaspora than a lifeboat for the elite.

This piece was originally published in Medium.

Douglas Rushkoff is the author of the forthcoming book Team Human (WW Norton, January 2019) and host of the TeamHuman.fm podcast. He also wrote Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus: How Growth Became the Enemy of Prosperity, as well as a dozen other bestselling books on media, technology and culture. For more, click here, or find him on Twitter.

Copied from #theGuardian for #posterity and a #reminder to #humanity of how some see us.

About that … see below 🔻

When will Jeff #Bezos fund the Library of #Alexandria ? #99% deserves it!

Does it matter that #Amazon has contracts with #governments ?

Should he have to pay his fair share?

I can make that argument if others can’t see it. 😉🤙😂🐸🥳 #information

#TLDR it’s an #oligarchy 99% are slaves to #ultra #weath

///// Amazon Web Services ( #AWS )

#AWS has several major government contracts, including the recent #OneGov agreement for potential savings of $1 billion for cloud adoption and modernization, as well as a share of the Pentagon's $9 billion Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC) contract and the U.S. Navy's $724 million Commercial Cloud Environment contract.

🚨🚨🚨 #Warfighting #JWCC #Pentagon #DOGE

AWS also holds the $10 billion #NSA Wild and Stormy contract for cloud services and supports over #11,000 government agencies globally, providing #classified and #unclassified cloud services through its GovCloud (US) regions.

#Key #Government Contracts and Agreements

OneGov Agreement: An agreement with the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) to provide up to $1 billion in savings for federal agencies to adopt, modernize, and train on cloud services until December 31, 2028.

Joint Warfighting Cloud Capability (JWCC): The Pentagon awarded a multi-award contract worth up to $9 billion to #AWS #Google #Microsoft and #Oracle for cloud services to support the Department of Defense. #DOD

U.S. Navy Commercial Cloud Environment Contract: In December 2022, the #Navy awarded AWS a $724 million contract to provide access to AWS Professional Services, its commercial cloud environment, and training resources, as well as support for the Navy's Project Overmatch.

‼️‼️ Wut is Navy Project #Overmatch How many planes have sunk?

NSA Wild and Stormy Contract: A significant single-award contract with the National Security Agency (NSA) providing up to $10 billion for #hybrid computing services to support the agency's modernization efforts.

#CIA #C2S and #C2E Contracts: AWS has a history of supporting intelligence agencies, including the CIA, with contracts like the initial $600 million C2S contract and subsequent follow-on contracts for cloud services.

AWS Offerings for Government AWS GovCloud (US): Provides cloud services that meet specific U.S. government security and compliance requirements.

AWS #Secret Region: Offers a specialized cloud region to support secret and top-secret data and applications for government customers.

AWS Public Sector Blog: Offers resources, including the Federal Addendum to the Standard Contract for AWS Marketplace (SCMP), to help government agencies streamline software procurement.

#introductions HI : ima former Ms. Information ℹ️ and I have questions.