Control-Plane Capital

A few months ago a couple of Indian doctors sued the Indian government to prove that viruses exist.

It took the government 4 months to respond with: "Trust me bro, I have credentials".

Over 700,000 people had watched the stream of the court hearing and then YouTube deleted it 😂

People are waking up to fake viruses, fake nuclear weapons, fake space, fake money, fake politics, fake authority, and all of this fake "science".

More and more people are aware that we live under something very close to a One World Government.

This is how we win eventually.

If our situation were hopeless, they wouldn't need all of this propaganda and all of these fake democracies.

The implications of more and more people realizing that viruses don't exist are massive.

The entire modern health-security state is built around a fake enemy category that converts ordinary toxicity, malnutrition, stress, environmental poisoning, medical treatment injury, social collapse, and industrial damage into a contagious-invader story.

This requires a civilization-level misdirection and depopulation system.

Sure, most are useful idiots, but the Satanic pedos at the top are all part of the club.

At the top level, there is no Russia vs Ukraine, USA vs China, Israel vs Iran.

It's all a big club and at the level that we can see, Secret Societies run the world (with the Jesuits likely at the highest level).

Once enough people realize that we live under a One World Government, all their theater falls apart.

More on the topic:

Probably the best podcast I've listened to in years.

Jason Christoff & Makia Freeman: War Drums, European Conscription, Mind Control & Cult Deprogramming

Jason Christoff is also the guy who made the "Planet Mind Control" documentary. Worth a watch.

https://rumble.com/v7a9ih4-documentary-planet-mind-control-jason-christoff.html

Scott Bessent thinks there will be a global financial reset in the next 4 years.

The video is from June 2024, so really about 2 years left on his prediction.

His track record as a hedge fund manager is not very good:

But he might get this one right.

The big unknown is the timing. The question is not if but when.

• "When are they going to decide to rug the financial system and transition the world to CBDCs/stablecoins?"

Trying to be cute with the timing might make you a victim of the Great Taking.

#AlexJonesEnergy

Fuck Justin Biebler and the police state!

The video in which Elon Musk talks about "magic money computers" in multiple departments of the US government.

These computers can just make money out of thin air. "They just send money out of nothing."

He talks about the numbers being off by 5-10% in some cases, but would you be surprised if the numbers are off by hundreds/thousands of percentage points?

Catherine Austin Fitts (Secretary of Housing and Urban Development) often talks about how she discovered missing trillions of dollars (~1990).

The day before 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld (Secretary of Defense) said they could not account for 2.3 trillion dollars. That was in 2001.

Take into account the actual (not official) size of the derivatives market (in the quadrillions), and you get very good reasons not to save in fiat, and not to save exclusively in the financial system (stocks, bonds, ETFs, etc.).

Infinite keystroke wealth is not a thing.

"Imagine if voting worked." 😂

(Spoiler alert - it doesn't)

Seems legit.

It took them 1800 years to hit the first billion people, and now we're growing a billion every 10 years.

Imagine if we didn't have vaccines, feminism, countless women murdering their children, and advanced contraception with birth control pills, condoms, IUDs, and surgical procedures. We'd be at at least 20 billion.

All governments agree that we're at 8.3 billion people, so it must be true.

I guess the first 1800 years, they were more focused on saving the "planet".

Man, I like Jeff Booth, but sometimes the statements he makes are wild:

• "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."
• "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"

Jeff is not like the other mainstream Bitcoin salesmen, in my opinion, he gives off good guy energy.

He's actually the guy who "orange-pilled" me and I've made lots of fiat on my Bitcoin trades.

He'd probably say that if I think in fiat terms, I don't understand Bitcoin, but I think that in order to really understand Bitcoin, you also have to understand how the world works.

If you don't understand how the world works, your attempts at Game Theory are worse than useless.

The people who focus only on understanding how the protocol works are too zoomed in to see the bigger picture.

The idealistic, protocol-centric scenario is unrealistic under a One World Government this tyrannical.

So I listened to a recent Jeff Booth podcast to see if he's updated his view on certain things, but he hasn't.

It's easy to tell because all of his podcasts are really just the same 1st principles presentation.

Going back to this quote:

• "As long as Bitcoin stays decentralized and secure ... then XYZ"

This of course assumes that Bitcoin is decentralized and secure.

I guess we'll have to ignore:

• 6-7 mining pools being close to 90% of the hash,
• Bitcoin Core being 80+% of the nodes,
• most retail users interacting through mobile wallets or browser extensions controlled by Apple and Google,
• increasingly more draconian on/off-ramp custody and surveillance,
• paperization practically destroying the 21M meme,
• crazy tax and regulatory frictions on payments,
• crazy Lightning Network centralization and regulation,
• significant portion of the reachable nodes being hosted on major cloud providers,
• centralized ASIC production,
• centralized out-of-the-box, noob-friendly hardware wallet production,
• etc.

Going back to this quote:

• "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger, so they'll try to co-opt it."

Let's assume that they can kill Bitcoin for a second.

Why in the world would they want to kill Bitcoin?

For 99% of cases, they'd rather you use Bitcoin than gold/silver, Monero or cash.

Unless you're moving tens/hundreds of millions of non-KYC Bitcoin to sponsor groups the Controllers don't like, they'd much rather you used Bitcoin than gold or cash.

As I've previously written, it is very likely Bitcoin was actually created by the government, so it makes very little sense for them to kill it in the current environment (with more adversarial alternatives available).

Can we at least stop pretending that Bitcoin in its current state is anti-establishment technology that makes our Jewish central bankers want to shut it down? That's just cringe.

For most Bitcoiners, the "have they co-opted Bitcoin test" is: "Is there a new block every ~10 minutes? (tick-tock, next-block?)"

• If yes, Bitcoin = not co-opted
• If no, Bitcoin = co-opted

Of course, this is a gross oversimplification - it focuses only on the protocol, while ignoring the policy and perimeter layers.

It's like saying: "If human breathing:"

• then human = healthy
• otherwise human = unhealthy

On this part:

• "They can't kill Bitcoin because when they attack it, it just keeps getting stronger"

My best attempt at pointing out where Bitcoin is stronger compared to 5-10 years ago:

• more people know about it (is good and bad),
• more hashrate (although insanely centralized, so doesn't mean much),
• higher fiat price (greater incentive to defend BTC),
• more people running nodes (although ordinary user nodes are at the bottom of the food-chain),
• more client decentralization (although Core still at 80%+).

So, a more honest Bitcoin pitch:

• Hey, we've got this thing that:
• might go up in fiat terms,
• is very easy and convenient to transport across borders,
• might protect you against the Great Taking if self-custodied properly,
• is very CIA/MO$$AD, MI6-aligned, so they've got no incentive to kill it.

Think of it as a stock of a blue-chip company, but a stock you can self-custody.

So, essentially similar to a paper stock certificate of a Blue-Chip company that is Controllers-aligned (e.g. NVDA, MSFT, GOOG, AAPL, AMZN, etc.).

This is the honest pumper Bitcoin pitch.

Not - "We are about to separate money and state (... after we get permission from the state), and the Jewish bankers are pissing their pants."

How the World works 👇️ (at the level that we can see)

As I've shown in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), we've lived under something very close to a One World Government for a long time.

But how does it actually work (at the level that we can see)?

At the level that we can see, the World is run by secret societies (it's really just 1 secret society with different names).

This was exposed in Italy with the Propaganda Due (P2) scandal. The lodge was originally formed in 1877 as Propaganda massonica. (More on this below)

They also blew the whistle (revelation of the method) with the TV series Prison Break.

"The Company" (= the Controllers) is the main antagonistic faction of Prison Break. It is a secret group of multinational corporate alliances known only by those who work for them or oppose them. Its influence and power over individuals stretches to the White House, controlling every decision the country makes.

The Company holds control over the government's sway on energy and the country's economy.

The Company is an international organization, so they have agendas and operations that they pursue all over the World. These include a 1995 incident in Berlin, a Nigeria incident, a Comrie Group incident, as well as several others.

"Scylla" is an external hard drive primarily located within The Company's main headquarters. The hard drive is said to hold reports and other personnel information on all of its current and former operatives.

In the US, The Company has operatives in:

• FBI, CIA, Secret Service, U.S. Marshals, U.S. Treasury, U.S. Army, etc.

Now let's step into the Real World - the Propaganda Due Masonic Lodge in Italy - as this model is replication in every country in the World.

Propaganda Due (P2) "was" one of the most controversial secret societies in modern European history.

Originally founded in Italy in 1877 as a private Masonic lodge, P2 later became associated with political manipulation, financial scandal, intelligence networks, organized crime, and some of the most disturbing events in post-war Italian history.

At first, P2 is alleged to have existed as a discreet Masonic lodge for members of the Italian parliament who wished to become Freemasons while keeping their membership hidden from the Roman Catholic Church.

By the late twentieth century, however, it had transformed into something far more dangerous: a secret network of businessmen, politicians, intelligence officials, financiers, military figures, and criminals running Italy.

P2 was part of the wider world of Italian Freemasonry, where political life, secrecy, and elite networking overlapped.

We start getting interesting info from around the late 1960s when P2 is under the leadership of the businessman Licio Gelli.

After Gelli's appointment as master in 1975, he was able to gather together in secret at least a thousand prominent individuals, mainly politicians and State administrators.

By 1981, when police seized P2's records, the scale of its influence shocked Italy. Its membership list reportedly included:

• 3 Italian cabinet ministers
• 43 members of the Italian parliament
• The heads of all Italy’s intelligence agencies
• Military officers
• Businessmen
• Journalists
• Financiers
• Public officials
• Prominent conservative figures

The discovery showed that P2 had practically run the state, including the security apparatus, and the country's finances.

P2 also run the highest levels of organized crime in Italy. Mafia-linked members included Michele Greco, rumoured to be the capo dei capi of Italy, and Michele Sindona, the lodge treasurer. Sindona was a wealthy financier who managed Mafia profits from the transatlantic heroin trade.

P2 had become the place where finance, politics, intelligence operations, and organized crime intersected.

I'm not breaking any news, but drug-trafficking (and child-trafficking) into the US (and pretty much any other country) is also State-run, and the State is Secret Society-run.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had a close relationship with the Vatican Bank.

Despite the Roman Catholic Church’s official ban on Masonic membership, Archbishop Paul Marcinkus, head of the Vatican Bank, became associated with P2. Michele Sindona and Roberto Calvi served as major financial advisers to the Vatican.

Calvi, together with Marcinkus, was accused of helping create hundreds of fictitious bank accounts through which Mafia drug money was laundered.

Pope Paul VI had placed a large portfolio of Vatican investments under Sindona’s control in 1969, a decision that reportedly cost the Vatican around $240 million in losses by 1975.

Organized religion is intended for control. You don't need middlemen to tell you what your relationship to the Creator is. You need to find it yourself.

Propaganda Due (P2) also had ties to terrorism. Its members staged at least one major terrorist attack: the bombing of Bologna railway station in 1980, which killed 85 people and wounded over 200.

The Bologna bombing remains one of the darkest events in modern Italian history.

P2 is also likely involved in the mysterious death of Pope John Paul I. The Pope had begun closely examining Vatican finances. On 28 September 1978, he reportedly announced his intention to remove Archbishop Marcinkus and three other Sindona protégés from the Vatican Bank.

The next morning, he was found dead.

No autopsy was performed, and allegations of suppressed or destroyed evidence have followed the case ever since. Officially, the death has not been proven to be murder.

The P2 scandal deepened further in 1982 with the collapse of Banco Ambrosiano, Italy’s largest private bank. Its head, Roberto Calvi, was closely connected to P2, the Vatican Bank, and the financial networks around Sindona and Gelli.

Banco Ambrosiano collapsed after being stripped of approximately $1.4 billion in assets.

The aftermath was marked by "mysterious" deaths.

Calvi was found hanging from Blackfriars Bridge in London. A coroner’s inquest initially called the death suicide, but his widow challenged that verdict. She presented evidence that Calvi had intended to reveal the names of those involved in P2's operations. The verdict was later changed to "cause of death unknown".

On the same day Calvi was found dead in London, his longtime secretary reportedly committed "suicide" by leaping from a window in the Banco Ambrosiano building.

The symbolism of Blackfriars Bridge also became part of the story. “Blackfriars” was interpreted by some as a possible reference to Freemasonry, adding another layer of mystery to Calvi’s death.

After the Banco Ambrosiano collapse, P2’s leading figures allegedly came under increasing pressure.

Licio Gelli (the Venerable Master of the Propaganda Due) lodge, vanished from a Swiss prison cell while being held for extradition. Michele Sindona died in a Milanese prison, claiming that he had been poisoned.

So Licio Gelli was arrested in Switzerland in 1982 for his role in the Banco Ambrosino scandal and the Bologna massacre but managed to escape from prison the next year.

He eventually agreed to surrender into the custody of Swiss authorities for a short period of time in 1987.

From 1996 until his death in 2015, Gelli remained in house arrest at his home in Arezzo (Italy).

Imaging murdering a bunch of people, collapsing Banco Ambrosiano in 1982 (a "black hole" of $1.4 billion), escaping from prison, etc., to get house arrest.

This model is replicated throughout the entire world.

For example, in Britain, the Fabian Society has supplied every Labour Prime minister in history. 141 of 411 Labour MPs are members. More than half the cabinet.

Short video on Britain -

Founded in 1884 with a wolf in sheep's clothing as their coat of arms, the Fabian Society is Britain's oldest political think tank. Their strategy, which they openly called "permeation," was to infiltrate institutions from within rather than build new ones. They founded the London School of Economics, started the New Statesman, wrote Labour's constitution, etc.

But the part they'd rather you didn't examine too closely? The founders — George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beatrice Webb, H.G. Wells — were committed eugenicists who advocated forced sterilisation and lethal chambers for those they deemed unfit. William Beveridge, the architect of the welfare state, sat on the Eugenics Society's council and presented his welfare blueprint to eugenicists on the same day Parliament debated it.

In the US, George Bush and John Kerry, both members of Skull and Bones, a secret society at Yale University, ran against each other in the 2004 presidential election.

I see the same thing in my country - all of the institutions are run by Freemasons and have been for at least 30-40 years.

So, vote harder, daddy.

As a member of a secret society, your oath is to the brotherhood, and betraying a brother = death.

If you've looked into the Old World (e.g. Tartaria), there is plenty of evidence that we are not the most advanced civilization in human history.

There have likely been multiple resets.

Videos on the topic:

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NFncJvS6AY&list=PLVsHlWhRW4zyNB1MIC-9DsVmQzNJxAjd3

Freemasonry could mean "free masonry" - as in they acquired Old World buildings for free.

They've likely managed to preserve technology/knowledge after resets which gives them a massive advantage in this game.

Andrew Carnegie started the great public library movement of the 19th century.

He "funded" the construction of more than 2500 libraries worldwide.

Although, there is no evidence of most of these "libraries" being constructed - he just used Old World buildings.

Many families donated their old books to these libraries, and many of the books were eventually slowly replaced/changed with goy slop books.

As Rockefeller said: "I don't want a nation of thinkers, I want a nation of workers".

This comment reminded me of Jeffrey Epstein chatting to Peter Thiel about Bitcoin's identity crisis.

Basically a TL;DR on how Bitcoin got captured.

We got to the point where the Bitcoin community cannot widely agree on what Bitcoin is — is it money, is it arbitrary data storage, is it digital gold, a combination, something else.

Contrary to popular belief, Bitcoin is not "inevitable" and "invincible", it's extremely fragile.

Bitcoin’s survival and adoption depend on whether its most committed users can detect, coordinate, and counter inevitable policy, market, and social attacks.

This of course doesn't work when Bitcoin's most committed users can't agree on what Bitcoin is.

As I've said many times - I am not particularly bullish on any community, but I'd be more bullish on a community that has a single goal and some courage than a community that is pulling in ten different directions.

So effectively, we have a pride of lions, but half of them got convinced that they are gorillas, switched to a vegetarian diet and died.

Then the remaining lions got attacked by a different pride and got killed.

The end.

I posted the most common Bitcoin misconceptions in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/what-made-me-sell-most-of-my-bitcoin ).

Now, more people than ever are paying attention, so it's a good time to recap.

1. “There can only be 21M coins.” Reality: Protocol caps base units at 21M BTC. Markets can (and already do) create synthetic claims (ETFs, futures, swaps, rehypothecated custodian balances) that exceed 21M. Price discovery then reflects claims supply, not just on-chain supply. Implication: Paper-share ↑ ⇒ realized vol ↓; upside rallies capped; custody proof matters.

2. “Stock-to-flow proves long-term targets.” Reality: S2F ignores synthetic supply, demand substitution (stables), and policy gating. Narrative comfort, not a pricing model.

3. “Hashrate up = security up, full stop.” Reality: Pool control and policy clients determine censorship risk. Top pools ≈ majority of hashrate; pools, not individual miners, decide templates in most cases. DATUM/Stratum V2 are not ubiquitously enforced. Implication: Watch pool policies, OFAC filtering, template standardization — not just hashrate charts.

4. “Miners can’t censor; the network routes around it.” Reality: With a few pools coordinating templates/filters, effective censorship windows are feasible (delay/confiscate fees, exclude sets). Economic pressure (insurers, exchanges) makes templates converge. Implication: Throughput is less of a limit than who writes the block template.

5. “51% attacks are unrealistic.” Reality: A sustained double-spend is unlikely; policy-driven soft censorship via pools is very realistic and cheaper. Implication: The live risk is transaction selection bias, not sensational double-spends.

6. “Protocol is immutable. It’s like TCP/IP.” Reality: Consensus changes are rare, but policy-level changes (relay/size/standardness) shape what’s practically allowed. Implication: “Immutability theater” can coexist with effective governance via defaults.

7. “User-activated soft forks prove ultimate user power.” Reality: UASF worked in that instance with massive social coordination + aligned miners/exchanges. Don’t generalize; future coordination may face legal/app-store/bank choke points. Past upgrade processes (e.g., BIP9, BIP8, “Speedy Trial”) revealed that miners and coordinated developers can accelerate or block changes faster than ordinary users can veto. Power concentrates among aligned institutional actors.

(👆️ This was the entire premise for why BIP-110 was going to work.)

8. “It can’t be censored.”

• Reality: The perimeter censors (banks, app stores, exchanges, cloud), not necessarily the base layer. That’s enough to throttle adoption. Implication: Watch wallet distribution policies, travel-rule hubs, blacklists.

9. “ETFs ‘legitimize’ Bitcoin.” Reality: They paperize exposure, centralize voting/custody, and let Wall Street set the tape via derivatives basis and inventory. Implication: Vol suppression ↑; adoption ↑ (in accounts); self-custody share ↓.

10. “If it’s better tech, people will adopt it.” Reality: Convenience beats truth. Stables with KYC + superior UX win Medium-of-Exchange until incentives flip. Implication: Bitcoin Store-of-Value containment is the base case; Medium-of-Exchange adoption requires mass incentives or policy failure.

11. “Education will fix it.” Reality: Behavior follows defaults and rebates, not whitepapers. Policy can make stables default, apps can hide Bitcoin; outcomes follow.

12. “Institutional adoption = censorship resistance success.” Reality: Institutionalization usually means perimeter compliance, paperization, and template steering.

These are just a few.

Someone remind this chart that "it's just math" and "there can only ever be 21M".

The "hashrate up = security up" narrative is also dead - and for good reasons.

"Solutions?" is a great question.

For most people the solution is "be more Amish".

Focus on what actually matters:

• your health, your family, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash - most don't), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc.

As I've outlined in this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ), finding solutions that turn Bitcoin into mass, non-custodial medium-of-exchange is extremely unlikely because of the Coordination tax.

The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale).

The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time.

In Bitcoin, you have 3 stacked systems:

• S₀ Protocol: consensus rules, Proof-of-Work, supply.
• S₁ Policy: relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors.
• S₂ Perimeter: banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax law, PR.

Security: S₀ is math; S₁/S₂ are sociotechnical (having both social elements (people, culture, organizations) and technical elements (machines, technology, processes)).

The Coordination Tax in Bitcoin: recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep S₁ (Policy)/S₂ (Perimeter) aligned with S₀(Protocol)’s ideals.

There is an Attacker asymmetry: One cheap perimeter tweak (Acceptable Use Policy line, bank heuristic, pool template) can shift millions. Defenders must hold all fronts, all the time.

You'll find yourself in endless civil wars, e.g.:

• Core v30 — Inscriptions / spam vs “art”
• Taint, “clean UTXOs” & compliant-Bitcoin vs grey-Bitcoin
• Node liability & “publisher” / CSAM / sanctions content
• Quantum-resistance, key-rotation & “lost coins”
• Paperization & “wrapped Bitcoin” vs base-layer Bitcoin
• Protocol ossification vs “surgery to survive”
• Blockspace & “digital cash vs data chain” (the rematch)

Many in the Bitcoin space are stuck in a sunk cost fallacy. This is exaggerated due to the low fiat price (compared to last year).

Many will be cured once the price recovers.

Bitcoin could still go up in fiat terms, but as far as freedom money goes, the battle is already lost.

The solution is to try to spend most of your time on things you can control, instead of arguing with bad faith/brainwashed actors in this rotten space.

The battle was never meant to be won because Bitcoin was likely created by the government to act as a digital decoy for physical gold.

I've written about this here: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

TL;DR in a screenshot:

Bitcoin as mass, non-custodial MoE wasn't really a winnable battle.

Every single aspect of Disney child grooming is Jewish

TL;DR on what the Bitcoin cycle actually is

The Bitcoin cycle is mostly just the liquidity cycle and by default, the liquidity cycle is optimized around the 4-year US Presidential cycle.

This is evident by looking at the average S&P returns and earnings per share (EPS) gains in each year of US Presidential terms.

For most of its existence, Bitcoin has been one of the most sensitive to liquidity assets (inject liquidity -> BTC price up, drain liquidity -> BTC price down).

Bitcoin's returns look similar (midterm years are worst).

We've lived under something very close to a One World Government for a while now and for the last ~200 years the US has been the main character.

Central Banks of "rival" countries coordinate injecting/pulling liquidity.

The 4-year US Presidential cycle as a control script:

• Year 1: sell hope, enjoy inherited momentum (don't break markets, keep liquidity flowing).
• Year 2: tighten screws, reset valuations, "discipline" theater.
• Year 3: pre-election sugar high (flood liquidity + narrative).
• Year 4: don't break anything big; sell "steady hand".

S&P price avg 1970–2024:

• Year 1: +9.9%
• Year 2: +0.9% (midterm year usually means bad returns)
• Year 3: +16.9%
• Year 4: +11.2%

S&P EPS:

• Year 1: +3.7%
• Year 2: +12.6%
• Year 3: +7.6%
• Year 4: +7.7%

Translation: Year 2 (midterms) = best earnings, worst price → forced multiple compression.

In other words, Year 2 is optimal for visible pain for multiple reasons, but mainly because it is furthest from presidential elections:

Year 1: too soon to rug, they just sold "hope & change". Year 3–4: too close to the big vote. Year 2: you can always blame:

• "previous administration’s mess"
• "congressional obstruction"
• "necessary tough choices"
• Voters mostly care about conditions right before the presidential election, not 2 years earlier.

You will also notice that EPS (Earnings per share) are strongest in the midterm year which is usually the worst for asset prices (forced multiple compression).

Translation: you often see decent real-world growth at the same time as:

• weak equity markets,
• drained financial liquidity,
• multiple compression.

Question: When is it cheapest (in legitimacy units) to impose that pain on financial markets?

Answer: when the real economy looks okay.

Because:

• If jobs / GDP look decent, they can say:
• "The economy is strong, we just need to normalize markets."
• "This is healthy rebalancing after excess."

If they wait until growth is already weak:

• any tightening/crack will be blamed for unemployment and visible hardship.
• the legitimacy cost explodes.

This is what they they prefer to do by default. This is not a hard rule in any way. There are way too many known unknowns, unknown unknowns, etc.

For example, we are currently experiencing the build-out of the subsidized AI surveillance state.

This is just an oversimplified TL;DR.

A short story on how Central Bankers view gold

Central Banker: Gold is a useless, shiny, yellow rock without yield. It is so irrelevant that we (the US Treasury) still uses an accounting price of $42.22 per troy ounce for its gold reserves on the federal balance sheet (unchanged since 1973).

Citizen: Then why do Central Banks store, secure, transport and accumulate tens of trillions of dollars of gold?

Central Banker: Because of tradition. h3h3h3!!!1

Meanwhile a Wikileaks release from the United States Congressional Research service:

• "The continued willingness of the U.S. government to hold a large underutilized stock of gold is, perhaps, best understood as a hedge against times of severe economic crisis when paper assets could be useless."

Crazy prediction: Before the end of 2033, Bitcoin gets exposed as goy gold (digital decoy for physical gold).

More context: https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created

Now that the BIP-110 saga is over, it's probably a good time to reflect.

In my opinion, BIP-110 failing is long-term good for BIP-110 supporters.

The BIP-110 question was:

• OK, Bitcoin mining is insanely centralized, so are the 5 mining pools (who share the same boss) going to get an order to do nothing, or will they be instructed to pretend that nodes actually matter?

From my old post "Who holds the Power in the Bitcoin ecosystem (does your node matter" - ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/who-holds-the-power-in-the-bitcoin ):

• Bitcoin does not run on ideals; it runs on coordination between code, hash, and liquidity — and those are controlled by a few dozen institutional actors who can synchronize quickly. Core defaults + pool templates + venue policies decide reality. Users matter only when they can coordinate economic liquidity, which is rare. Expect future changes to follow the same political playbook.

In that post, I put "ordinary user nodes" last in the power stack.

If BIP-110 had succeeded based on decentralization theater and misguided "game theory" circus, BIP-110 supporters would still be living a lie.

Stop listening to boomer Bitcoiners who tell you that "Bitcoin is decentralized and secure" and do some of your own research.

Bitcoin is not decentralized and secure, it was simply allowed to look that way ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/is-bitcoin-decentralized-and-secure ).

Until you realize that we live under something very close to a One World Government ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-i-know-we-live-under-a-one-world ), your attempts at game theory are worse than useless.

Most people are just too mentally weak to face our current reality and would rather live a lie.

To understand why Bitcoin will fail as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).

And no, "firing the miners" will not be nearly enough.

To understand why Bitcoin was most likely created by the government, read this article ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ).

If you are too heavily into Bitcoin and down bad on your position, I hope our jewish overlords give Saylor a $1 trillion loan at 0% interest so he can pump the BTC price.

Then, more people will focus on what actually matters:

• your health, your community, your skills, your adaptability, tools, machinery, weapons, self-sufficiency, gold, silver, Monero (if you need digital cash), land that produces food, energy, local services, cattle, etc.

Usually, as the governability of the holder base of an asset increases (more captured, more in the system), our fiat overlords are more incentivized to pump its fiat-denominated price.

( This is of course an oversimplification. )

If Bitcoin's fiat price pumps, most Bitcoiners will quickly forget that BTC is a captured asset, so you usually get fiat gains as a gift for being a good, little goy.

In another post, I'll cover how I got lucky and sold 85% of my BTC at 113K and the remaining 15% at 95K. (Basically my opinion on why the Bitcoin cycle exists)

I'd only use Bitcoin for speculating (trying to mine fiat), and as of now, I'm staying away because I don't think that the incoming Quantum scam is priced in ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/a-quantum-resistance-upgrade-would ).

In the 1970s, the average life expectancy for Golden Retrievers was 17 years, now it's 9-12 years (with worse quality of life).

To keep your dog healthy and happy:

1. no vaccines
2. diet: raw meat, raw milk, raw eggs, raw wild-caught fish
3. no neuter
4. no pesticide-heavy lawns
5. no big pharma, toxic flea/tick medications and treatments, no antibiotics.
6. no EMF blasting
7. no toxic toys

Black man exposes the Jews for sucking baby penises:

Proof:

Watched a Joe Rogan clip recently and it reminded me of the Bitcoin community.

Bitcoin's community is following the Joe Rogan arc 😂

Used to be new, cool, and allegedly anti-establishment. Now it's the complete opposite.

The Bitcoin ETFs approval = Joe Rogan's Spotify deal

From DEI girlfriends and woke faggot lead devs, to mass paperization, to Bitcoin influencers worshiping politicians, while the same politicians continue to spit in their face, too much damage has been done.

There's a minority trying to course-correct and coordinate the normies with small patches like BIP-110, but that's too little, too late.

If you need statist normies to understand complex technical topics and depend on them taking action and not being psyoped by bad actors for your solution to work, you've already lost.

Bitcoin as designed is not a solution for a One World Government this tyrannical.

Stop the fight, ref. He's already dead.

Don't use pattern recognition and keep voting you filthy goy.

As a good little goy you should only consume content by subversive jews and their jewish AI.

CDC Whistleblower's Secret Recording: "We Buried the Data on MMR & Autism, I'm Completely Ashamed".

"The higher-ups wanted to do certain things and I went along with it."

Just sitting here on this pear-shaped, wet rock, spinning at 1,000 mph and traveling through space at 66,600 mph.

This would have been impossible if nothing didn't explode and turn into everything, enabling us to evolve from pond scum.

Thank God these scientists figured everything out for me so I don't have to think for myself 🙏

Pour a drink for the humiliation fetishists who still vote, for those who still think there are solutions from within the system.

It's wild that people still think the puppets they see on TV are the ones making the important decisions in 2026.

As long as you vote, you've given your consent to be governed, regardless if your candidate wins.

The sad reality is that a society gets the government it deserves.

The boomers got psyoped into a nanny state because the system "works" for them and have sold their descendants into slavery.

Now their descendants are trying to vote their way out of slavery.

Playing games you can never win is not very smart.

The only way out is to burn the whole thing down with a tax revolt, reject fiat slavery and REJECT dependence on the state.

The state doesn't need you to love it, it needs you to need it.

Just look at the quality of life and life expectancy of the Amish compared to statist groups.

This Natural Law seminar by Mark Passio is great:

https://odysee.com/@DotConnectorReports:e/Mark-Passio---Natural-Law-Seminar-FULL-Version:e

Your daily reminder that viruses don't exist and vaccines are used to depopulate.

"Scientists" have now defined 44,000 dis-eases and thousands of dis-eases have the same symptoms as the "hantavirus" but somehow they knew to test specifically for "hantavirus" 😂

Protect your family, your pets and your cattle.

Modern bitcoiners are the type of guys to remind the teacher that she forgot to give the class homework on a Friday 😂

The "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" crowd.

"Transparency" means you are transparent; the system is not.

We'll have to see how being transparent works out for you in the next few years.

Just got debanked for the first time.

Randomly got a notification that 100K euro have been transferred from my account.

Went to the local bank, and the lady told me they've decided to close my account.

When I asked why, she told me "We don't have to give you any reason. We can just close your account.".

Told her I want to transfer my 100K euro to a different bank, and she told me that the money is no longer in my account, so she has to ask whether they'll allow me to transfer it 😂

It is a good reminder that a deposit is a loan you make to a bank. You are an unsecured creditor of the bank, not the owner of any specific asset the bank holds.

They can just fuck with you.

Had to wait ~1 for the central office to give me permission to transfer my money to another bank, then had to pay 15 EUR for my bank statement since they already closed my online banking 😂

I use bank deposits because I must (payments, interface with the system), but this is a good reminder not to confuse them with survival capital in this rotten regime.

Banks are just a state-dependent intermediary and the state is the enemy.

Bitcoin is now ~18 years old and still practically unusable as mass, non-custodial Medium-of-Exchange.

It hasn't been improving. In fact, it's gotten worse as non-custodial MoE over the years ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/how-bitcoins-developers-are-attacking-2a5 ).

In the last few months, I've often wondered where would we be if we had spent the last 18 years stacking physical gold and silver and had worked more on that front.

We'd have easily engineered silver shortages and squeezed the fuck out of bombs, EV, solar panel producers.

Lots of silver is also needed to build the physical infrastructure to power, cool and connect AI data centers for the One World Government surveillance state.

The paper gold/silver markets are enormous and very tightly managed by our One World Government. We could've definitely done some damage and exposed their paper games by stacking physical.

If you look into the Coordination Tax, you'll realize that Bitcoin will inevitably fail as mass, non-custodial MoE ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/bitcoin-will-fail-as-mass-non-custodial ).

The Coordination Tax is how the Controllers manage Bitcoin (smaller scale), but also how they manage society (larger scale).

The Coordination tax in Bitcoin is the recurring human + legal + distribution cost to keep the Policy (relay/mempool defaults, mining templates, wallet behaviors), Perimeter (banks, clouds, app stores, ISPs, payment networks, tax, law, PR) aligned with the Protocol's (consensus rules, Proof-of-Work) ideals.

The Coordination Tax in society is the recurring total cost of getting large numbers of humans with different incentives, different information, different risk tolerances, different time horizons, and different status games to act as one organism across time.

If you do a deeper dive, you'll realize that it's very likely that the government created Bitcoin ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/why-i-think-the-government-created ). See screenshot below for TL;DR.

If you gave me the task to "orange-pill" someone today. This is my best attempt:

1. Bitcoin might go up in fiat terms (NGU).

2. The CIA, Mo$$ad, MI6 crew really need Bitcoin because it isn't private by default, it isn't fungible, it is becoming more and more custodied by default and paperized. They certainly don't want to alienate everyone into physical gold/silver, or Monero.

3. If you need to transfer your wealth across borders, Bitcoin is very liquid and definitely a good option.

I wouldn't try to sell them on "digital cash". Monero is clearly better as digital cash.

Monero will however also get psyoped into "quantum-resistance" upgrade scams and many of the hardware wallets (as with Bitcoin) are very likely backdoored.

Monero is more Coordination Tax-optimized than Bitcoin, but it won't be enough.

If the Coordination Tax were a person, it'd be this guy. Unfortunately, he remains undefeated.

Bond yields are rising.

You can now lend your money to the government for 30 years at 5% with real inflation at 15-20% and rising 🤝🤝🤝

What the Wizard of Oz actually represents

Pastor Alan Dildo wants you to know that the CIA has informed him and a bunch of other pastors that aliens are real and God doesn't exist.

But don't worry, the government exists and is here to replace God.

Organized religion = the government.

Everyone has their personal relationship with the Creator and people like pastor Alan Dildo should never be taken seriously.

Mr Scientist, if you can't isolate any virus, how do we know viruses exist?

Mr Scientist: Trust the science, mr. Goy.

Viruses don't exist which means your government has been trying to maim/kill you, your family and your pets/cattle with vaccines for a very long time.

It also means we've been living under a One World Government for a very long time.

Will the Indians finally isolate a virus?

Dr. Tom Cowan does a great job of summarizing why viruses don't exist in this video.

https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

The DARPA "entrepreneurs" reading from the same script as always 😂

But guys, I thought Elon Musk and Sam Altman hated each other 😂

They've already sold their souls and they're trying to take as many people with them as possible.

The Amish always knew not to play their Jewish, Satanic games.

Their goal: a One World government that fully replaces God.

Government replaces God when it becomes the highest practical authority over meaning, morality, safety, identity, money, speech, movement, family, life, death, forgiveness, punishment, and the future.

The test is simple:

• Can you say "God says no" and still live?

The more the answer becomes "not really", the more the replacement has already happened.

This is great theater. There will be signs.

The script:

• How to move from US-dollar hegemon to multi-bloc gold-back settlement without a clean "US surrender" and without making it look like a board decision?

More context ( https://controlplanecapital.com/p/the-us-israel-war-with-iran-brings )

Backdoored Bitcoin/Monero hardware wallets are much more of a threat than Quantum computing.

There is zero credible evidence that Quantum can be engineered to scale cheaply and reliably enough to be broadly useful, and yet most of the attention is focused on Quantum and not the very likely case that most of the main hardware wallets are backdoored.

This video is great:

If you spend some time doing objective research, you'll likely come to the conclusion that there is no neat solution that makes you "immune to the NSA". The best you can do is:

• Make mass, silent theft via one corporate/vended rail impossible,
• Force any serious adversary into messy, noisy, manual operations if they want you specifically.

The only real structural defense is collusion forcing:

• Heterogeneous multi-sig (different vendors + DIY),
• Multi-source entropy (XOR’d seeds),
• Passphrases kept off the compromised device,
• Independent stacks for different key shares.

A state-level actor can plausibly:

• backdoor RNG/nonces,
• exfil keys via signatures,
• coerce vendor into "minor tweaks",
• intercept shipping,
• or just use host+legal leverage.

There are very many attack vectors and in some places, you just have to trust as you can't verify.

Some of the attack vectors:

• Closed-source secure elements with opaque behavior.

• Compromised RNG -> predictable keys.

• Firmware "updates" that: (a) leak shards, (b) weaken PIN delays, (c) selectively target flagged serials.

• Supply chain substitution: (a) devices swapped in transit, (b) chips with additional logic embedded.

If we assume Controller-grade adversaries and cooperation leverage over:

• silicon vendors,
• big wallet brands,
• customs/parcel systems, then for mass-market users:
• "self-custody" often means: "I'm holding a compromised device that behaves like self-custody until it's politically useful to make it misbehave."

And of course, they don't need 100% coverage. If they can de-risk 80-90% of "self-custody" BTC/Monero via:

• hardware design,
• vendor pressure,
• update channels, then most people hold just another pool of conditionally controllable assets.

Even if they never fully exploit it, the option exists.

If you think hardware wallets being compromised is a bit of a stretch, maybe look into Dual_EC_DRBG, operation Bullrun, Edgehill, the company Crypto AG, operation Rubicon, etc.

Who knows what sorts of stuff people like Adam Back and co are up to.

They are already on their back-up plan. Banks are lending billions to Caiman Islands hedge funds who then buy trillions of Treasuries on leverage while the Fed and the Treasury keep volatility low so the hedge funds don't blow up.

After the reset:

• the petrodollar falls,
• Gold is the top-level settlement asset for blocs,
• CBDCs are the day-to-day money,
• and almost everything else is a revocable license.

So they certainly have a back-up plan. Hope you do as well.

Don't know what to think of this one 😂

Not sure if coincidence or not.

If Bitcoin doesn't comply, they'll eventually have to suspend dividends and this thing will tank.

The professor Jiang character is very interesting.

Graduated Yale university and used to work for the UN (aka the One World Government organization that sponsors child trafficking and genocide by vaccines).

He was suspected by the Chinese government of spying in 2002 and was deported 😂

Going viral organically doesn't really work in 2026. Platforms like Twitter, Youtube, TikTok, only promote content that pushes the official narrative (so plants and useful idiots).

After watching a few of his videos, I think it is very likely he is an intelligence asset (most likely CIA).

He could be a useful idiot but I find this less likely based on his takes.

It was much easier for intelligence agencies to control people's access to information pre-Covid.

Many more people used to watch mainstream media, but the CIA pushed the propaganda too far.

Once different networks started repeating the same script word for word, people stopped watching and lost trust.

The CIA knew they needed to keep control of the narrative, so they started pushing certain "independent media" personalities.

Tucker Carlson (CIA) got "fired" by Fox news (even though he had the highest ratings 😂) just because people stopped watching TV and the CIA needs him to reach more people.

In many cases, even when professor Jiang is likely correct about his conclusions, his argumentation is so flawed that he ends up pushing people away from the "conspiracy theory".

Watching some of his recent videos remind me of the recent podcast with Joe Rogan and Theo Von.

The whole podcast looked like a hostage video. Both completely compromised (especially Rogan) and terrified to not say something they shouldn't say.

Professor Jiang is a bit more subtle than these guys, but I still find it unlikely he's a useful idiot based on his interviews.

The "this is extremely dangerous to our democracy" moment is probably when the CIA knew they had to focus on pushing the "independent" media personalities.

Controlling the media is at the core of the protocols of the learned elders of Zion.

The CIA hasn't given up on propaganda now that mainstream media is cooked (only watched by boomers, retards, and retarded boomers).

Great video by Dr. Sam Bailey on how viruses don't exist and have never been isolated.

Dr. Tom Cowan goes into more detail in this video.

https://rumble.com/v6rh2e3-there-was-no-covid-virus-how-weve-all-been-duped-by-the-medical-establishme.html

When it comes to these massive "conspiracy theories", most people usually say: "There's no way that's true. Do you know how many people would have to be in on it?"

And of course, not very many people would have to be in on it.

Most doctors still vaccinate themselves, their children, and their pets even though vaccines are used to depopulate.

However, many of the main puppet politicians are likely in on it (US, Russia, China, India, Iran, Israel, etc.). The Covid scamdemic was a mask off moment for our One World Government.

Sadly, I don't think any of the politicians in European countries make any of the important decisions, so this is mostly just theater.

The European Union, which was likely created by the CIA, centrally controls everything that matters.

Feel free to pick your preferred puppet politician locally though. Because democracy!

Richard Werner does a great job of explaining how the European Union came to be and how it closely resembles the Soviet Union in this video.

They need to hook this lady up with an earpiece.

Allegedly, Christina Koch, one of the Artemis astronauts, is also an actress in Mad Max: Fury Road.

Big if true.

This is why you hire mainly military personnel and not random actors.

(Unless you're DEI-maxxing)

Turns out the Pakistani PM is also a puppet for the US and Israel.

How stupid do you have to be to not remove the "Draft - Pakistan's PM Message on X" line 😂

Welcome to our One World Government

I'd be interested if any of the moon landing believers, who are intellectually honest, can watch this logical analysis and still come out on the other side as believers.

Matt Walsh pushes all of the same logical fallacies in the video below.

Try and see if you can objectively examine the evidence (or the lack thereof), or whether you'll enter into a cope spiral.

Starts at 10:30