Delta, Dirac

thinking more about bitcoiners as a people

friends along the way, unironically

no need for exclusive or

Fiat is the most moral money

Only elites will understand me

1 like 240 views Few listened Can you prove you were giving proper advice on how to be cautious with seed generation, basically the primary thing, or were you more about the "scene?"

This was my take a few years ago when I built a test run batch of the seed balls concept

came up with. 2048 individually numbered ball bearings.

"Needs" are retarded metaphysics. U actually can just die. "Needs and rights" are concepts for women and children. Realpolitik or metaphysical play fantasy idealism, which way bitcoiner?

There is no sovereignty without capacity for violence. The individual has no capacity to engage in the world meaningfully without a large, hierarchically networked capacity for violence. Not your violence and power, not your sovereignty. You think you can buy sovereignty with money? Childish boomer isolationist retards.

A contentious proposal? -- what if the finest restaurants were centered around beef tartare and bone marrow as the central class of main dish?

The bitcoiner bitcoiner. The world's greatest armchair human.

The bitcoiner discovers the pinnacle of mercantilism and swiftly uses this to retire from engaging dynamically in the markets of his time. Will a philosophy of "living" for a better to-morrow, while denying the world to-day, ever find itself as a dominant node of thought by which markets of transform? Perils of the futur-ist.

Central bank spotted in Poland

From will to power a requirement to parallelize/decentralize emerges

Thereby we find the origins of trust as the most efficient social primitive; trusting is a form of risk taking

For scaling trust there is spoken, written, and more recently monetary language

Money is 3rd here

What if the bitcoin prices is down because 99% of bitcoiner have negative aura?

It was not until the year 2029 when the bitcoiners finally capitulated from their youthful, peace-loving idealism.

Bitcoin's true use-case and adoption forcing function had finally emerged amidst a ponzinomic economy without defectors: murder machine money.

Bitcoin respecters spotted in Warsaw, Poland

What is bitcoin culture?

Who today can say it is anything other than peak faggotry in its present actuality?

As they say, the first step is admitting you have a problem.

What is a bitcoiner?

An observer who imagines himself to metaphysically exist outside of nature

The nodes have control

Are you GMV maxing, anon?

There is a need for a new style of writing. I assure you it will emerge.

It will go as follows: someone will use OpenTimeStamps to prove they wrote something, and in conjunction with sharing its hash, a sort of riddle will be shared with the world, and published from an identitifier (perhaps over NOSTR or something similar, cryptographically signed, and importantly, hard to delete).

While binary market predictions enable playing both sides and revealing only the correct one, possibly being sly about the riddle shared, an essay and a riddle together, especially if one establishes a track record of revealing in a way that seems faithful, will not be possible to fake. To prove "I knew exactly the statement that would need to be put out, years in advance, and I knew that certain circumstances might require it with uncertainty as to whether those would arise."

This will be required by the statesman of the future.

Proof of work? This will be proof of thought at a tier above the mercantilist who appeals to wealth as a substitute for the power of wisdom and the ability to shape the thoughts and actions of men.

Legacy coinage

Nothing else is being attempted, whether admitted or not, than the complete transformation, even the weakening and suppression of the individual: the supporters of the majority never tire of enumerating and anathematising all that is bad, hostile, lavish, expensive, and luxurious in the form of individual existence. # 132

"Increasing interdependencies multiply the power sources in society which cannot be politically controlled" - Luhmann, Trust and Power

Hence, the isolationist bitcoiner who stomps his feet about the future world does little to actively impose his will onto the world beyond his trifling consumptive activities.

Ferrari was the original, beautiful, yet temperamental

Lambo was the vengeful clone, wanting more cars, for all the masses

Which is bitcoin, which is ethereum?

Whence will end the mediocre's hysterium?

When will bitcoiners embrace refined elitism?

Heading to Riga, Latvia

Traveling throughout Eastern Europe a bit, and will probably also go by Berlin and London

Anyone interested in meeting, feel free to reach out

A high time preference

A low time preference

What if I prefer to not think in time or history at all?

Perhaps only then could the future ever be mine

What if by Jevons paradox, the sociocybernetic purpose of trust minimization is a path to restoring opportunities to trust?

There is something quite funny about the distruster who cultivates the feeling of cleverness to supplant confronting the existential narcissim of objective value in oneself from which the sense of indignity festers. You think you have "rights"? 😂

Type of people who never rode close to the edge

"the distruster, willingly or unwillingly, can hardly avoid his distrust being perceived in him and attributed to him. Hostile feelings are difficult to keep hidden, and the cautious defences which now seem necessary, betray the intention."

If they paid in bitcoin they might have understood possession is 9 10ths of the law

And the world remained wary of the Bitcoin

And the Bitcoiner remained weary of the world

Occasionally, the curiosity of individuals on either side got the best of them, and they would go out and say "hello!" with a beaming smile of possibilities, with something the other deemed to be of some value, and so it went

You would destroy all trust in the world without ever having taken the time to understand its purpose? To distrust trust in its totality... isn't that the same cavalier dismissiveness with which nocoiners often approach bitcoin? Perhaps Niklas Luhmann has a more refined understanding than yours?

Yes

We all knew the Club Orange guy living in California is merely a leftist scenester

He kicked me out of the canadian bitcoiner group chat for not being faggy LARPers with them 🤷‍♂️

What if AI enables market tools that are so incredibly good at solving the double coincidence of wants, it crashes and permanently reprices the market for money itself by 80%?

Bitcoiners: we must return to a high trust society

Also Bitcoiners: Don't trust-

What?

Bitcoin as a hazing ritual to find other humans willing and inclined to become bitcoiners

Increasingly considering that bitcoin largely is in the present primarily about friends made along the way.

Thinking about humans as primary rather than machines, one can consider bitcoin a Schelling point for a population of actors capable of locally operating with higher in-network trust than the rest of the world. Can bitcoiners rebuild high trust society? -- alas, bitcoiners are without a goal, for they have substituted goals for the sacrificial meta-goal abstractive recursion of "Bitcoin itself."

Coming soon to an anarcho-tyranny near you

Maybe this approach can help?

https://sendwyrd.com

"Even we nowadays are hard and mercilous to political revolutionists, but that is because we are in the habit of believing the state a necessity..."

• Friedrich Nietzsche, Human, All Too Human #102

Allow me to present an idea

The notion of "bitcoiner" as an identity is recently deceased, and this underpins the malaise? We all of course new this day was coming, but who knew it would come so soon!

Is the typical bitcoiner now The Man Without Qualities?

The weakness of the ANTI-statist revealed

Though this weakness may be his principle strength, for how many bitcoiners would have nothing to talk about should "the state" "vanish"?

Will there be a 2nd honest man amongst bitcoiners?

I am already the 1st bitcoiner Nietzschean it would seem, thus capable of speaking the truth: anti-statism is anti-worldism

This vague post is simply a convenient way to time stamp calling my shot In the future, it will be common that people write white papers and use open time stamps to prove they knew something insightful The most brilliant people will describe the future incisively across ever longer timespans, some chasing millennia... though divergence accelerations accelerates Long horizon thinking beyond the trivial reflexive case of its emergence Or perhaps it will be a secret... e.g. the secret within the "bitcoin community" that I was the first to really push the anti seed oil meme, well before Nic Carter -- secret alpha, but bitcoiners still live in the fiat world and are not Dionysian or able to digest secret alpha. Social secrets where you can only find out by paying close attention, perhaps sendwyrd.com will spread such secrets

Coase's theory of the firm The nature of human organization Architecturally shaped behaviors These factors brought me to bitcoin Recently figured out a central disruption higher category to human organization, and yes, has subtle bitcoin/monetary theoretic considerations Not theory: reference implementation company construction is accelerating; all AI convos will drastically change at highest levels

Are humans solitary or team hunters?

Is Will to Isolationism the behavior you observe among humans today, or are true individuals rare?

Do you want steering by individuals, or by committee? Might one call groupings of "individuals" who lead zero men, incapable?

The source code is now openly available for OpenWyrd protocol and my reference implementation of SendWyrd.

given you built bitchat and twitter, maybe this concept will interest you?

I made a new NIP PR (G6) so wyrds can render previews.

https://github.com/OpenWyrd/sendwyrd

If you cannot be commanded by the world

You must command the world

What is this?! A Will To Meme?

"Talk is cheap motherfucker" -DMX

It's funny. People became so obsessed with the idea of free speech and unstoppable money, they forgot that the "purpose" of speech and money is solving the double coincidence of wants problem, in practice, not as a meme circlejerk over existence.

Use the tools.

I posted PR for NIP G6. Let messages such as the one below run JS to decrypt content with PK in link itself, so you don't have to click link to view the message. Nostr is platformless. Sendwyrd/Openwyrd is identity-less. Protocol and reference implementation will be publicly available.

https://sendwyrd.com/w/igyg5En65KJ06aMm#ibZ71io6JCQ1Fyvpf67t91lXpta_ioC05NOBz6k2unc

The content held inside the wyrd object below can be deleted, even while this post can't really

https://sendwyrd.com/w/0BrbQ1MN5n-t9V3E#jdy7aFxIjbUF77LgMRh_DdkYwAgD7cp4FpRBsyr9v5I

https://sendwyrd.com/w/7Ic3allji_MC60Di#irMLPu4EC8p2alDtk2mWJdTunbA-JQ-aOXWRuaebCAw

Isn't all of life a containment operation of all against all as each agent seeks to expand? But the nature of the containment and the impulse to contain... isn't itself carried out by those who are mimetically contained? You think the controllers are truly in control?

This weekend I made a new messaging/social protocol-ish thing called SendWyrd.

It is more or less a prettier pastebin for tweet-like objects that you can pass around to people, over any rails. No algo, feed, platform, or identity. Maybe you like?

https://sendwyrd.com/w/3B_22l4DdR62Lywa#Z_y8YKPxldCmKsP2_TSRF4QjBrF-2d4yFTXmnCJBxxM

Drafted a NIP for "capability-URL references" on Nostr — events that point to host-blind encrypted artifacts (read key in URL fragment, host can't decrypt).

Lets Nostr clients render them as first-class objects with encryption badges + expiry, instead of bare URLs.

Scheme-agnostic so any artifact protocol can plug in. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/2327

To be anti-statist broadly is a will to communism -- what?

Yes, well, where are you actually changing things in a particular way rather than complaining like common rabble with mere ideology?

Bitcoiners have few exports, their companies are fake -- perhaps the price is low because the bitcoiner is ugly?

Is it time for bitcoin friends to do more in the world than talk about how brilliant they are and how much better the world will be, and actually become powerful today?

An internet architecture built by resentful nerds, the children of hippies and immigrants wanting to rise above their station. Are you surprised it turned into this?

Who is building the Nietzschean cyberspace? With hierarchy, order, truth, and beauty?

De'mos-graph is destiny.

If you never "short bitcoin" (spend)

Do you not short yourself

For an imagined future, a legacy--

Do you truly live in a way that is legendary?

Dreaming of nothing more than the distant descendant who says: you were a GENIUS, so much SMARTER. And THEY will know it, ha! :) https://image.nostr.build/2dd781f7408ee95b638d425e0249784e1257da40caa83bea86727bda7ab2c3f4.jpg

Is bitcoin rare, or is the pursuit of money just about the most banal thing in the world?

Do you really think of yourself as rare for having found a peak, of a most common activity within human life?

Why do you care to be sovereign, if you are merely excellent within the herd?

What if the great game

Is to build the battleground

For the true culture wars?

The cultures that have been unable to flourish

On the cesspool brought to us

By Gates and Jobs?

I am sure I will speak with Jack Dorsey again

Eternal recurrence

What does it mean for bitcoin to become culture?

Nearly every bitcoiner goes through a phase of wanting to explain bitcoin to people, and who wouldn't! Isn't it fun to explain new things?

Most people realize that the success rate of explanation is quite low and decide it is no longer fun. It is easy to say bitcoin shatters a lot of false beliefs for people and that "we" are so clever so of course the masses will be slow, but is this true?

Or might there actually be a profound epistemic flaw in the idea of explanation in and of itself as a method of spreading ideas? If a person thinks they are reasonable, would they not project that sense onto others, and thereby, affirm their view of themselves by giving someone else an explanation, about anything?

So who is threatened, existentially? Are you not the first to be by the mere implicit assertion that explanations are a thing that work? For if the possibility that you adopted a thing for a reason other than cleverness exists, what does that say about your understanding of the world?

Rather than giving you all my thoughts on these matters, do you see something that might have been broadly missed about the nature by which things are adopted?

And please, do not be so lazy to say that we are adopting plenty fast; this is a discussion on propagation dynamics, not an argument about what is or isn't "fast enough". Also, avoid the tautology that once it is adopted broadly, it will thus be culture. Finally, I posit that the adornments of bitcoiners to various lifestyles whether constructive or degenerate, diets, marital patterns, nomadism, etc. are not cultural inventions of bitcoin. Being wealthy, leisurely, and so on are cultural modes of being that exist outside bitcoin.

Do bitcoiners wish bitcoin store and define all their values,

To relieve them of the great weight of authoring their own?

Looking at the quality of discourse on the right, by people retarded enough to think shitcoins are real, it makes it obvious that the only way things get better politically is if heritage bitcoiners get into politics, and win.

We need American Hodl (

) to be Vance's VP in 2028.

There is no need to cajole, lobby, and ask politicians to do favors for bitcoiners and hope that the world does not destabilize in a way that causes mass violence targeted at bitcoiners, it can just be done directly. Why did we need to wait until some guy with a shitty software company started buying bitcoin? Why couldn't a bitcoiner start a billion dollar public company?

This is the moment. Everyone is talking about the economy. Only bitcoiners can provide answers. Only bitcoiners can provide a compelling narrative to counter the rise of Momdami types. The Republicans have no problem with fiat-communism, so they are losing.

Stop orangepilling politicians, it doesn't work. We need 1st decade bitcoiners running for office.

Two sided marketplaces that are centralized must be decentralized with NOSTR for people to have freedom of association again.

It is insane that anyone tolerates these forced interactions rather than granularly, parametrically, game theoretically trading with individuals.

Who do you think has a higher IQ? Person A, who says:

“Bitcoin fixes everything.”

Or person B who says:

“Life, as Schrödinger observed in the early 20th century can be seen as the emergence of self-replicating negentropy maximization machines, and if we combine this with noting the cybernetic principle states that the purpose of a machine is it does, we now have perfectly described the purpose of life. Further, upon reflecting on the ever outward spiraling set of energy inputs into all consumed goods & services, we find human economic decisions are based on localized information amidst opportunity costs as to the negentropy maximizing action, of course, setting a global objective value function within which the appearance of subjective preference is a mere stochastic process to escape local maxima, and then by Landauer's principle we must note that destruction of information, as is this with a money that is not a fixed numerical partition, is entropic, which is minimized with the energy minimal fixed money Schelling point, bitcoin's proof of work being such an absolute minimum being trivial, indicates that all economic desires are delivered most expediently by the market on a bitcoin standard after all fiat money has vanished.”

Anyone here use Threema? More secure than Signal?

No one will care about NOSTR

Until the gig economy is on NOSTR

My pan tweet went viral on Twitter.

With 2 million views, that's 100x more than all the people on Nostr.

Nostr needs economic, two-sided-marketplace apps to gain traction imho.

https://x.com/DeltaClimbs/status/1960542748647547120

A friend called me yesterday:

"Hey, I'm a completely different person" (I could hear it in his voice)

"...I am now a bitcoin person. I appreciate you telling me crypto was all BS years ago because it helped give me the conviction to go with my gut."

Men must be toxic to evil

"Imagine a special passport issued by the League of Sovereign Individuals, identifying the holder as a person under the protection of the league."

• The Sovereign Individual, page 320

How many years are we from AnchorWatch becoming the first such league? 🤔👀

From The Sovereign Individual I am learning that in the early years of the printing press, from 1518 to 1525, Luther's works were a third of all German language books sold.

So there is nothing odd about most of Nostr being discussion centered on Bitcoin.

Sometimes I will read Beautyon's tweets even though he has me blocked, and I will think that I should be working on the critical product for adoption that everyone else is neglecting... but then I remember there is nary a serious bitcoiner to be found in most parts.

But the military is serious, and through building weapons, I can carry the torch of the dying culture of engineering and technology advancement, a culture bitcoin will restore to its full grandeur, but totally foreign to the fiat-world bitcoiner of the present era. Pity.

Where do my new followers come from if I am not actively posting? I get a few weekly.

Is this indicative of more pro-social discovery mechanisms than on X?

Bitcoin is deterrence

What you can do with it is largely emergent from the constraints indirectly imposed on others

Hodling is deterrence

New bitcoin mining technique just dropped

The real "bitcoin lightning" ⚡

https://newatlas.com/drones/faraday-caged-drone-lightning/

I used to be retarded

I still am retarded

But I used to be too

Lfg

😂💀

Great example of how trash the bitcoin influencers of the post-Saylor era are.

People who are great at entertaining, but have a shallow understanding.

An iPhone is obviously a terrible comparison, but the sort that a lay person with a fiat rather than software or engineering background would make.

But you probably like the entertainment more than you crave the truth, too.

Anyone have book suggestions?

Woah, this is super bullish for Nostr. I haven't been on here much lately, but it seems the non-bitcoiner normies (who think they're edgy because hYperBorEan, or whatever niche) are coming. Idk how they got here, but they're here. Lfg 🚀

BITCOIN IS NOT MONEY BITCOIN IS NOT PROPERTY BITCOIN IS NOT A COMMODITY, CURRENCY, SAVINGS, OR AN ASSET BITCOIN CONFERS NO RIGHTS

Bitcoin is a software messaging protocol. MESSAGES.

Bitcoin enables free speech and association without interdiction.

Interfering with speech or association is not just unconstitutional, it is the foundation of tyranny anywhere, and enacted only by criminal, violent assault.

It must also be understood of course that all taxation interferes with the natural rights of persons to freely associate.

There are no "bitcoins", bitcoin cannot be "owned", and the notion of "title" to bitcoin is an abstraction under the reality that bitcoin will recognize and not reverse valid transactions signed under duress or downstream of criminal trespass. There is no such thing as "title" to "bitcoins" because it is fungible cash, you cannot correctly say "these coins" vs "those coins".

This is not something to convince any authority of for there is no valid authority that may govern speech or association. Of course, people may be fooled into acting dead and impotent, like a trapped animal oblivious to the fact his cage was never locked.

Every time someone talks about regulation and government, they are supporting the government, supporting its frame as a valid owner of all humans. This is the peak of high time preference behavior, a total moral capitulation and submission. And it is only possible first by promoting LIES about what bitcoin is, for if you state the truth, it is too obvious that all the regulatory ideas are invalid and unlawful.

Bitcoin is software, it exists, it does not grant rights. If you burn a piece of wood and survive the night from the heat, it does not make warmth a right being given to you. You are USING the wood and it has certain behavior. It is anthropomorphization where the person being fictitiously constructed is none other than daddy government. But you are alone with the laws of physics, and other people trying to lie to you about the nature of the world.

Bitcoin is first and foremost Freedom of Association tech.

If you tell someone it's XYZ money thing, you guarantee someone else has set the mimetic framework / terrain.

If you start with association, it may spur a person to consider association mechanisms and attack vectors.

Crickets. No one is trying to build the stuff that actually makes money on here, just social media apps. 🤦‍♂️

The overwhelming majority of great technologies were invented in the West / West-allied nations.

Steam Engine: England Internal Combustion Engine: France Basic Oxygen Steelmaking: Austria EAF Steelmaking: Scotland Bessemer Steelmaking: England Carbon Fiber: America Integrated Circuits: America Jet Engine: England/Germany Silicon Carbide Fibers: Japan Airplane: America Container Ship: America Modern LEDs: Japan Fucking food itself (Haber-Bosch): Germany Cement: England Fracking: America Nuclear Energy: America CNC Machining: America Pick-and-place: Japan Drones: America Bitcoin: America MOSFET (underpins internet): America The Internet: America Fiber Optics: India LASER: America 3D Printing: America Vulcanized Rubber: America MIMO: America GaN devices: Japan OLEDs: America GPUs: America Cellphone-to-sat coms: America Cloud Compute: America/England Hypersonic Glide Vehicles: America Nanocrystalline Alumina Fibers: America

Shall I go on?

Never invested in a commodity.

None of them.

Never will.

"Omg you're missing out"

Maybe.

You're missing out on being in the room where the great leaps forward in human civilization take place and being a multi-trillionaire.

Keep your tyrannical wastelands.

If anyone is at Adopting Bitcoin in El Salvador now, I will be speaking soon on the Galoy Stage at 4:00 about how bitcoin will transition to become the unit of contract denomination and tools needed for the intermediary stages.

#yomamasofiat she orders two sides of guac at Chipotle instead of stacking sats

#yomamasofiat she left you to be an only child when her overlord government gave her a tax break to have fewer children

#yomamasofiat she fed you Formula soy sludge as a baby

I have written a 2500 word paper on Nostr entitled: A Conjecture on the Possibility of Fungibility Amidst Relational Contract Participants

I would like to share it with any technical folks who are interested in taking a look and providing feedback or disputing the conjecture. DM me or reply

Ok, let's be honest Nostr for social media is going through a lull, I'm barely ever here. I am still ultra-bullish, but my thesis remains that real world economic applications on Nostr will be the impetus for eventual social layer growth.

Product idea: SCIF level construction* shipping containers for handling sensitive private keys while deterring advanced exfiltration methods. *basically a large vault.

Did you know one of Swan Bitcoin's PR people/firms also does PR for shitcoins? If you hired a PR person and asked them how to turn from shitcoiner to bitcoin champion, they might just tell you buying followers and then loudly calling out obvious scams is a good tactic.

You might think you're ugly, but if you truly love Bitcoin, you will always be beautiful. 💜🫂

Who do I know at Blockstream? 🤔

https://stacker.news/items/189598

To accost the man who proclaims bitcoin fixes everything with interrogation as to the particular nature of some problem (though usual trivial) is to misunderstand the stochasticity and path ambiguity by which inventiveness occurs, it is a failure to understand the nature of life itself.